| Author |
|
Blaster Omega Sentinal

I find your lack of faith, disturbing.
Joined: 07 August 2007 Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline Posts: 9620
|
| Posted: 31 October 2007 at 10:37am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Is he Devs or is he Brawl? It is indeed a winding road and it seems not to lead to Amirillo. So vote and lets us see.
__________________
I miss nothing,Oh my God Uhura's black! and does Nems own a one?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
|
|
Sirlagerlot Moderators

Probably the best forumer in the world
Joined: 02 June 2005 Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline Posts: 9941
|
| Posted: 31 October 2007 at 10:42am | IP Logged
|
|
|
where is the option for "that tank wot got shot" as my wife refers to him.
__________________
Thanks to the legend, Nemmy-pops Scourge for the sig!
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Blaster Omega Sentinal

I find your lack of faith, disturbing.
Joined: 07 August 2007 Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline Posts: 9620
|
| Posted: 31 October 2007 at 10:43am | IP Logged
|
|
|
bless her little cotton socks send my excuses will ya
__________________
I miss nothing,Oh my God Uhura's black! and does Nems own a one?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
fudgecrumpet Herald of Unicron

Knows first hand how Prez tastes.
Joined: 25 August 2006 Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Online Posts: 11318
|
| Posted: 31 October 2007 at 1:43pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Wheres the option for devastator is just a funky nickname, he uses the name brawl on official documents.
__________________
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Blaster Omega Sentinal

I find your lack of faith, disturbing.
Joined: 07 August 2007 Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline Posts: 9620
|
| Posted: 31 October 2007 at 1:45pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hey sausage off, plan your own perfect polls
__________________
I miss nothing,Oh my God Uhura's black! and does Nems own a one?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Soundwave9504 Matrix Bearer

Crank it up, Soundwave
Joined: 30 May 2005 Location: United States
Online Status: Offline Posts: 16467
|
| Posted: 31 October 2007 at 3:00pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
really name as Brawl because toys or etc would be that Devastators would be name for gesalts as well.. I wish that Bay would change name..

__________________
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Motormaster Combiner

King of the Road
Joined: 13 August 2006 Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1511
|
| Posted: 31 October 2007 at 4:31pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
I was a tad confused by this as well, seeing as how it was Brawl in the game and not the film, and Devastator in the film but not the game. Mind you, I was also puzzled as to why Ratchet appeared in the game's cut-scenes, but not in the game itself.
Ah well.
__________________ "These wheels are made for crushing."
Sprites being drawn: IDW's Devastation series, all Dolph Lundgren movies
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Blaster Omega Sentinal

I find your lack of faith, disturbing.
Joined: 07 August 2007 Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline Posts: 9620
|
| Posted: 31 October 2007 at 10:26pm | IP Logged
|
|
|

__________________
I miss nothing,Oh my God Uhura's black! and does Nems own a one?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
fudgecrumpet Herald of Unicron

Knows first hand how Prez tastes.
Joined: 25 August 2006 Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Online Posts: 11318
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 9:15am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Im suprised noone has kicked up a fuss about shockwave being such a rubbish boss in the game.
__________________
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Blaster Omega Sentinal

I find your lack of faith, disturbing.
Joined: 07 August 2007 Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline Posts: 9620
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 10:39am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Well fact is, he is Brawl. Because of one type-o I will not refer to him as Devastator. Had he been named so on the Box fine. I am not scared of change one bit. But The Box says Brawl MOST of the TF forum says it, so say we all.
__________________
I miss nothing,Oh my God Uhura's black! and does Nems own a one?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Casperuk Herald of Unicron

The friendly ghost
Joined: 31 May 2005 Location: England
Online Status: Offline Posts: 13163
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 10:50am | IP Logged
|
|
|
well in the US dvd he is still called devastator
__________________
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Nemesis Scourge Matrix Bearer

The Unrivalled Entity of Darkness
Joined: 17 August 2005 Location: England
Online Status: Offline Posts: 19305
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 10:55am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Honestly, if we really wanted to get anal about this, we should be saying his name is Decepticon Brawl rather than just Brawl.
__________________
"Please allow me to confirm... *Unravels a dozuki* if what you are saying... is true or not." - Katsura Kotonoha
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Garren Headmaster Junior


Joined: 17 June 2006
Online Status: Offline Posts: 650
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 11:06am | IP Logged
|
|
|
No no, if we really wanted to be anal; We would call him Devastator, because that was his name in the movie. Toys arent always canon, in my opinion
__________________
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
joshlowe Combiner


Joined: 30 May 2005 Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1542
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 11:16am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Garren wrote:
| No no, if we really wanted to be anal; We would call him Devastator, because that was his name in the movie. Toys arent always canon, in my opinion
|
|
|
Yes they are.
Transformers is a franchise built around toys, therefore what the toys say are first and foremost. That'd be like saying that Spiderman's webshooters being organic is right, and the comic, which came first, is wrong.
I love many of Marvel comic's version of Transformers more than the toy bios, but I've never been such a fanboy to consider the comics more official or right than the toys.
Edited by joshlowe on 01 November 2007 at 11:19am
__________________
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Blaster Omega Sentinal

I find your lack of faith, disturbing.
Joined: 07 August 2007 Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline Posts: 9620
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 11:17am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Anal about it I aint talking shit tis my opinion. (without pressing )
__________________
I miss nothing,Oh my God Uhura's black! and does Nems own a one?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Sirlagerlot Moderators

Probably the best forumer in the world
Joined: 02 June 2005 Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline Posts: 9941
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 12:27pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
joshlowe wrote:
Garren wrote:
| No no, if we really wanted to be anal; We would call him Devastator, because that was his name in the movie. Toys arent always canon, in my opinion |
|
|
Yes they are.
Transformers is a franchise built around toys, therefore what the toys say are first and foremost. That'd be like saying that Spiderman's webshooters being organic is right, and the comic, which came first, is wrong.
I love many of Marvel comic's version of Transformers more than the toy bios, but I've never been such a fanboy to consider the comics more official or right than the toys.
|
|
|
I agree with you to a point.
Night Attack optimus prime is NOT canon!
__________________
Thanks to the legend, Nemmy-pops Scourge for the sig!
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Garren Headmaster Junior


Joined: 17 June 2006
Online Status: Offline Posts: 650
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 2:12pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
joshlowe wrote:
Garren wrote:
| No no, if we really wanted to be anal; We would call him Devastator, because that was his name in the movie. Toys arent always canon, in my opinion
|
|
|
Yes they are.
Transformers is a franchise built around toys, therefore what the toys say are first and foremost. That'd be like saying that Spiderman's webshooters being organic is right, and the comic, which came first, is wrong.
|
|
|
So if one of the toy boxes said "Optical Primus" and "NegaGron" were the names instead of Optimus and Megatron, you would go by the toys instead of the movie?
The analogy is a little off. But I don't know where you're coming from with it. I'm not a toy-guy. But in Spider-mans comic universe, his webbing is whatever the comics are. In the cartoons, his webbing is whatever the cartoons is. The comic, for example, doesn't overwrite the canon of the cartoon.
Which is what I'm trying to get at. The cartoons canon wouldnt overwrite the movie. In the movies, Spider-man's webbing is organic. You can't refute that. It's not "wrong". It is "right".
But this isnt the case for TF the movie. We clearly have a toy and a movie. Despite TF being based on the toys, I say the movie preceeds the Toys. For the Movie universe, the movie is correct and the toys are not.
Just because there's a toy of red starscream doesn't mean that starscreams color in the movie was an error. Which is what you're suggesting, off-hand, by saying "if the toy says so, the toy is right."
Now, if a character in the movie had called Devastator by the name of "Brawl", then there would be a legitimate point. But Devastator was his one and only name. Thus, it's his name. The movie isn't incorrect.
Edited by Garren on 01 November 2007 at 2:14pm
__________________
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Galvanise_ City Commander

Damn you Bay. Damn you.
Joined: 30 July 2006 Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline Posts: 4846
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 3:36pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
He was meant to be called Brawl in the movie. The people making the movie aknowledged this mistake. The US DVD is wrong. Plain and simple.
Therefore his name is Brawl.
__________________
Thanks to Nem for the sig!
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Blaster Omega Sentinal

I find your lack of faith, disturbing.
Joined: 07 August 2007 Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline Posts: 9620
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 3:42pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
agreed.
__________________
I miss nothing,Oh my God Uhura's black! and does Nems own a one?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
joshlowe Combiner


Joined: 30 May 2005 Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline Posts: 1542
|
| Posted: 01 November 2007 at 8:11pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Garren wrote:
But in Spider-mans comic universe, his webbing is whatever the comics are. In the cartoons, his webbing is whatever the cartoons is. The comic, for example, doesn't overwrite the canon of the cartoon.
|
|
|
Okay, I don't agree per se, but I didn't use the best example. I did use an example that wasn't a fair comparison.
Lets stick with Transformers
It is a toyline first. It is Hasbro's property. When they took a red microman cassette and called it Rumble, that was it's official name. It didn't matter how much Sunbow called him Frenzy, they were not it's creators.
Bay could call the tank Destructor the 2nd if he wanted, but it belongs to Hasbro and they said it's called Brawl.
Frenzy is blue, the Autobot jet is called Jetfire, the tank is Brawl. That is according to those who owned the rights before Sunbow/Bay made their commercials and will continue to own them after.
Garren wrote:
So if one of the toy boxes said "Optical Primus" and
"NegaGron" were the names instead of Optimus and Megatron, you would go
by the toys instead of the movie?
|
|
|
Yes, they're Hasbro's property. If they call them something, that is their name. I can call them names I prefer, like Alt Meister Jazz as that's who he is, but officially, his name is Meister, nothing else.
__________________
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |